Canada and NATO :: The North Atlantic Treaty Organization, NATO

In the prevail entitled Canada, NATO and The Bomb The Western Alliance in Crisis by Tom Keating and Larry Pratt the main issue discussed was Canadas localize in Europe, North America and their view on the North Atlantic pact Organization. It went into specific issues dealing with political tension within Canada and tension orthogonal Canada with different countries. It went through the years of different political parties and how they dealt with the matters of NATO.It states Canadas flavor dealing with matters such as the alliance, war, and decision making with other countries concern in NATO. The book came across Canadas decision making as though Canada went along with the decisions made by other countries. Canada, NATO, and The Bomb is non a book to inform it is a tale book. It addressed issues that had happened antecedently and stated the type of involvement Canada had in it. In most cases, a book dealing with these sensitive issues, which involved other countries, would provide the pros and cons just now in this case only the cons of NATO and the alliance were provided. This book showed NATO as creation an organization that is very unorganized. It came across as though the countries involved did not respect each others thoughts and opinions. It dwells on the mistakes made by countries for example the joined States, various other European countries. It made it be as though NATO was in conflict within each other making the organization as a whole seem unequal to(p) of compromise and the defence of anything. At many points NATO wanted to vote the United States out of the organization except this obviously never happened. At maven point it was a problem about the possibility of being reign and ultimately all overwhelmed by too close an association with the United States (pg.30) for Canada and their relationship. The themes of the book were Canada and its position in NATO and NATOs and its position in the world. The theme was not presented clear ly. One of the points were Canada and the main focus was any and everything but Canada. It stated over and over again that Canada did not approve of very much but that was it. It came across as if Canada was only complaining and nothing was being done. NATO and its position are expressed as only conflicts within the congress. It was giving history presentation information dealing with NATO, its purpose and its views on important topics.