Wednesday, February 20, 2019

Analysis of “The Lorax” Essay

The grade, The tolerant Tree, is a book written by Shel Silverstein that is about the relationship between a tree and a male child. In the beginning of the story, the male child and the tree spend a lot of date together having fun. For example, they would play hide and seek, the son would play on the branches, and the boy would play king of the forest with the gos of the tree. The tree would be very euphoric because she was moveing with the boy. Throughout the story, the boy would spend less and less time with the tree. As a result, the tree would perish sad. Once in a eon the boy would come tolerate end, asking for certain things, and the tree would be felicitous to help the boy because she loved the boy so much.Through the story, The natural endowment Tree, Shel Silverstein relates a lesson of how giving is more important than winning. In the story, the boy rams reinforcement of the tree by taking everything that the tree has. The tree withstands freely without s ound off because the tree loves the boy, and wants him to be happy. In the end, all the boy wanted to do was to spend time with the tree once again. If the boy did not ceaselessly spot advantage of the tree, the boy did not adjudge to miss, and become suffering about the old tree that loved him so much.The trees love for the boy is a perfect example of what people should be like giving freely, and unconditionally. If everyone was like the tree, at that place would be very lesser un gladness in the world, and the world would be a better place. If countries started to turn freely to one another, there would be fewer wars, there would be no more sadness and devastation, and there would be world happiness and peace. The message from Shel Silverstein is to not be like the boy who ultimately becomes distressed by taking from the tree. In summary, Silverstein uses the story to expound on the mind that giving is more important than receiving.The story also has a delicate reference to the relationship between mother and child. The tree (the mom) was willing to give eachthing to the boy (the son). The tree give ups herself in order to oblige the boy happy, which any mom would probably do for her son. In the beginning, the tree wanted to sacrifice its time just to play with the boy. This is similar to a parent, which sacrifices time to interact with and provide for their kids. Towards the teenage long time, the tree gives up her apples so that the boy could have money. Likewise, many parents sacrifice money to have their children enjoy their teenage long time movies, cars, trips, etc.When the boy becomes an adult, he takes the branches and trunk of the tree away to make water a house, and a boat. All of these examples exemplify the ways in which moms make so many sacrifices to make their children happy, but some kids just take them, run with them, and never think about how much it cost their moms. As depicted in the story, the boy never expressed any gratit ude to the tree. The boy rarely went back to visit the tree, but only visited the tree to take something away for his own personal benefit. Furthermore, moms also show sadness when their children leave them for college, and adulthood. When the boy does not come back to see the tree for years at a time because of his own issues, the tree becomes sad. In short, Silverstein illustrates the fundamental interaction between mother and child by showing the selfless acts of parents and the selfishness of children.The book, The Giving Tree, ordure strongly connect to our relationship between the environment and existence. Currently, there is an evident problem of global warming. This recent dilemma is caused because of our selfish taking from the environment. The tree can strongly resemble the earth on which we live, and the boy can resemble humans. We constantly take from the Earth, and rarely give back to the environment.For example, during the 20th century, industries took advantage of the Earth without replenishing resources deforestation, driving animals to extinction, and over-fishing. Furthermore, since global warming has become such a big problem now, we want to go back to live on the lush, non-polluted earth. Likewise, after the boy takes everything away from the tree, the boy wanted the tree to be like it was before. Ultimately, the book elucidates the way in which humans abuse the environment just like how the boy misused the tree.A question that can come to mind when reading Shel Silversteins story is, what is the reason for writing the story. Silverstein might have written the book for preteen children, but it was to teach everyone of the give not take, principle. Moreover, another question can be what is the reason for allowing the boy not to think about his selfishness? maybe Silverstein wanted to portray the fact that people are sometimes selfish. Finally, throughout the story, why is the boy referred to as a boy even though he becomes a man. Maybe Silverstein was writing in the perspective of a mother because a mom always calls his son her boy.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.